“Don't Cry For Me Argentina” as it was sung by Madonna in the
1996 film version of the musical Evita (1976), a work by Tim
Rice and Andrew Lloyd Webber. If I were Argentinian I would cry too,
but because of the musical. I'm not talking about technical or
theatrical reasons, and even less about the music, I'm complaining
for the historic facts that Evita represents, or rather for
HOW these are represented.

Hence
Evita is
one more example of the importance of the historians (Hollywood gives
us examples with almost every historic
film they produce). It
is not enough to have a good story it also needs to be accurate with
the historic facts; and that implies that one source of information
isn't enough to get to the true. We can never know which flaws might
have the source and that is why is necessary to contrast it. Even if
in 1976 Rice and Webber could only count on Mary Main's work as the
only written biography existent, sure they could had newspapers or
even witnesses to talk to. Or at least they could have drawn a
profile of the book's author so they could know how accurate it would
be. But of course they chose a much easier path. And now I ask you:
how would have British people reacted if two Argentinian had made a
musical trivializing Margaret Thatcher? I guess it's something
unthinkable in the 70's when the north hemisphere had some kind of
absurd moral superiority against the south hemisphere, but what would
happen nowadays? Has the situation changed enough?
Ricard Gispert
@ricardgispert
@ricardgispert
No comments:
Post a Comment